Search toggle
Say hello.
Focus Str. 5th Ave, 98/2 34746 Manhattan, New York
+1 222 44 55
Real Briefings

BEL-DRB-2024-11-19 November 19, 2024 Design Review Committee City of Bellingham
← Back to All Briefings
Nov
Month
19
Day
Minutes
Published
Status

Executive Summary

On a storm-swept Tuesday afternoon, the Bellingham Design Review Board convened virtually for their November 19, 2024 meeting to consider a significant architectural project at the heart of Fairhaven. With most members participating via Zoom due to dangerous weather conditions, the board reviewed the design response for People's Bank's new branch building — a two-story, 4,780-square-foot structure proposed for the prominent corner of 12th Street and McKenzie Avenue, the former Zane Burger location.

What's Next

The project advances to final design review and building permit review. Staff will condition the Design Review permit to require a full lighting plan at building permit submittal. Mechanical screening will be reviewed during the building permit process. The applicant will consider the board's feedback regarding dark vinyl chain link fencing with privacy slats for the northeast corner service area separation. No specific timeline was provided for final approvals or construction commencement. #

Sign up free to read the full briefing

Unlock Full Access — It’s Free

Full Meeting Narrative

# A Fairhaven Architecture Debate: Blending Contemporary Design with Historic Character ## Meeting Overview On a storm-swept Tuesday afternoon, the Bellingham Design Review Board convened virtually for their November 19, 2024 meeting to consider a significant architectural project at the heart of Fairhaven. With most members participating via Zoom due to dangerous weather conditions, the board reviewed the design response for People's Bank's new branch building — a two-story, 4,780-square-foot structure proposed for the prominent corner of 12th Street and McKenzie Avenue, the former Zane Burger location. This meeting represented the culmination of months of design development that began with early guidance in June. The project, designed by Michael Stevens of Dykeman Architects, sought to balance contemporary banking needs with respect for Fairhaven's historic character. The session would test whether the architects had successfully addressed the board's earlier concerns about lighting, solar shades, parking configuration, and the challenging transition between the building's traditional masonry front and its more modern rear elevation. ## The People's Bank Design Response Chair Ryan Van Straten called the meeting to order with board members Maggie Bates, Coby Jones, and Lexi Costic present, along with Dave Christensen and Lexi Costic participating as Historic Preservation Commission subcommittee members. City Planner Emmy Scherrer presented the staff report, noting this was the first time the board would see the complete design, including the previously unseen north and east elevations. The project required a departure from city code requiring a continuous building wall, necessitating a 25-foot break from the adjacent Sycamore Building due to geotechnical constraints. "The geotechnical engineers not to build within a certain distance from that building," Stevens explained via Zoom, "and so we made that a little bit larger than what the recommendation was to make it a comfortable space to be in, and allow plantings and things to grow." Stevens, joining remotely from Everett due to the dangerous weather, walked the board through comprehensive responses to their earlier guidance. The lighting plan featured carefully selected fixtures: Hinkley Dorian sconces for the building exterior and Cyclone Domia decorative pole fixtures for the courtyard space. "This fixture on the left will exist in that courtyard space," Stevens noted, "chosen to sort of respond to some of the other acorn fixtures that are in the historic zone there." The solar shades sparked particular discussion. Stevens explained these would be minimal, airfoil-shaped elements only on south and west elevations, designed to clip seamlessly into the curtain wall system. "They're actually an airfoil, so it's like an airplane wing," he said. "We did that instead of louvers, because the wider space is less attractive to birds to sit on." The canopy design represented a modern interpretation of traditional weather protection. "This is a bent piece of steel, so a continuous piece," Stevens described. "We didn't want to create places for birds to perch, and cobwebs to form, and that sort of thing. And so it's a very simple bent piece of metal at each of those window openings." ## Addressing Parking and Site Layout The board's earlier parking concerns had prompted significant revisions. Originally, the design squeezed three parallel stalls along the McKenzie easement. The redesigned approach reduced this to two properly sized stalls with protective planted areas and a concrete seat wall offering bay views. "We were able to readjust the spacing of these stalls out front," Stevens explained. "The planter ends are no longer equal, and we're able to introduce a seating element in the same style and language that we have elsewhere on the site right out front." The parking configuration maintained ADA accessibility near the front entrance while addressing traffic concerns. "This allows this first stall to be further away from the intersection," Stevens noted. "There was some concern in the last meeting about general congestion." Refuse and transformer locations were consolidated in the front area, screened by plantings and designed to complement the building architecture. "Rather than kind of breaking up this parking series of parking stalls, it made some sense to locate both of those here," Stevens said. ## The Design's Traditional Elements The building's street-facing elevations showcased careful attention to Fairhaven's architectural heritage. Stevens highlighted the sophisticated masonry detailing: "We have some detailing at the cornices, but also these pilasters have been further developed with some relief." The design incorporated Flemish bond brick patterns turned vertical in recessed pilaster slots, with the same pattern appearing as a horizontal band beneath second-story windows. The material palette emphasized durability and regional appropriateness. A rough-cut stone base at street level provided "haptic quality for those that are walking by," while smooth-cut stone appeared as window detailing on the second floor. The cornice featured soldier coursing in masonry topped with a concrete cap. The glazing strategy prioritized pedestrian engagement. The interior was programmed so "all of the activity, the active function of the branch is there right on 12th," Stevens explained. The teller line, large video screen, and customer areas were positioned to create visual interest for passersby. ## A Contemporary Corner: The Northeast Elevation The meeting's most substantive discussion centered on the building's northeast corner, where the design departed from traditional masonry to incorporate composite metal panels. Board member David Christensen raised pointed questions about this transition. "This is an unusual site, in that the vision to the public is probably the most important thing," Christensen observed. "You can kind of see at least three sides of it pretty clearly... It's pretty visible. It's not really a back, even though I understand it's a back." Stevens defended the approach as intentionally contemporary while maintaining proportional relationships. "The material is a material that we have elsewhere. It's metal. So it's not like a hardy or some other panel material. It's an aluminum composite panel. So it is a nice material," he explained. The bay proportions matched the masonry elevations, with the stairwell receiving special treatment through continuous glazing rather than punched openings. "It was an opportunity to use some materials that we use on other People's Bank projects and allow those to provide an interpretation of some of the other design moves that we're doing," Stevens said. "It's intended to be similar in presence. But it's the employee entrance. And so we want it to be less grand, less ornate with the brick detailing, but still very elegant." Lexi Costic drew a comparison to precedent: "Reminds me a little of the Acme Building on 10th and Harris has the same kind of neutral brick color, with the fiber cement paneling on the backside... There's kind of a hierarchy there." ## Chain Link Fence Consensus A minor but notable discussion concerned the proposed chain-link fencing at the northeast corner to separate the site from the neighbor's trash area. While not prohibited, staff sought the board's input on appropriateness in the commercial core. Board members quickly reached consensus on improvements. "My only comment would be, I would agree with Coby that it should be a dark vinyl. So it kind of goes away or a dark color, and or with slats," Christensen said. Coby Jones agreed, noting the fence would be "pretty obscured" once landscaping matured. Van Straten summarized the board's preference for "dark vinyl and privacy slats," though this wouldn't require a formal motion. ## The Departure Approval The meeting's formal business centered on approving the departure from traditional building wall edge requirements. The 25-foot break from the adjacent building, necessitated by structural concerns but expanded to create a meaningful outdoor space, required board endorsement. Van Straten framed the issue: "Sounds like it's not possible to have a full building wall edge. Eight-foot break is required for the building next door. They've gone to a 25-foot break, but included some a concrete seat wall, and a custom metal trellis to sort of create the appearance of a barrier of sorts." The board expressed comfort with the solution. Christensen appreciated "the scale of the break," though wished "it was on a different side" for better solar exposure. Van Straten, speaking for those "that don't really like the sun, and would rather not get sunburned," welcomed the north-side location. Costic noted an additional benefit: "I appreciate that the mural on the side of the building will be preserved." ## Building Appreciation and Approval As discussion wound down, board members expressed admiration for the project's overall quality. Maggie Bates summarized the sentiment: "Don't have any objection to it. I think it's quite attractive. And it's pretty clear when you, when you pointed out that the materials were the same. Then for me, it I know it's gonna work when you actually build it, because I think that's pretty important. It's a beautiful building. I love the details, the attention to all the details." Costic moved to approve the departure, with Christensen providing the second. The motion passed unanimously, clearing the way for the project to proceed. ## Storm's End and Professional Appreciation Stevens expressed gratitude for the collaborative process. "Thank you. Appreciate everybody's time as well, and the process has been great. So, and thank you to the city staff, too, Emmy and your team," he said from his weather-delayed location. The meeting concluded with mutual appreciation for navigating both meteorological and design challenges. Van Straten thanked everyone for their time, acknowledging "It's a beautiful building." ## What's Ahead With design review approval secured, the People's Bank project will proceed to building permit review, where final lighting plans will be submitted and mechanical screening details finalized. The approved departure allows for a unique courtyard space that transforms a geotechnical constraint into a community amenity. The design represents a thoughtful evolution in Fairhaven architecture — honoring the district's historic character while embracing contemporary needs and materials. The project's success in balancing these sometimes competing demands offers a template for future development in this cherished historic area. The storm that kept participants apart paradoxically demonstrated the resilience of civic engagement in the digital age, allowing important community business to proceed despite challenging conditions. As members logged off into the stormy afternoon, they had advanced a project that promises to enhance Fairhaven's streetscape while serving the banking needs of the community for years to come.

Sign up free to read the full briefing

Unlock Full Access — It’s Free

Study Guide

### Meeting Overview The Bellingham Design Review Board (DRB) met on November 19, 2024, to conduct a design response meeting for the People's Bank Fairhaven Branch building project. The Board reviewed the final design proposal for a new 2-story, 4,780 square foot commercial building at the former Zane Burger location (1315 12th Street) and approved a requested departure from design standards. ### Key Terms and Concepts **Design Response Meeting:** A formal DRB meeting where applicants present their final design proposal after incorporating feedback from earlier guidance meetings, seeking final approval. **Design Departure:** A formal request to deviate from specific municipal code requirements, requiring board approval based on demonstrating the alternative meets design intent. **Fairhaven Urban Village Design Review District:** A special zoning area with specific design standards intended to preserve the historic character and pedestrian-friendly environment of the Fairhaven neighborhood. **Historic Influence Area:** A designation for areas adjacent to historic districts that must consider historic context in new development while allowing more contemporary design approaches. **Building Wall Edge:** A zoning requirement that buildings maintain continuous frontage along sidewalks to create a cohesive streetscape and pedestrian environment. **Cornice:** A horizontal decorative molding that crowns a building or element, traditionally used to create visual separation between building sections. **Pilasters:** Rectangular columns attached to walls that project slightly from the surface, used to create rhythm and depth in building facades. **Solar Shades/Sunshades:** Horizontal exterior fixtures designed to reduce solar heat gain through windows while maintaining architectural aesthetics. ### Key People at This Meeting | Name | Role / Affiliation | |---|---| | Ryan Van Straten | DRB Chair | | Maggie Bates | DRB Member | | Coby Jones | DRB Member | | David Christensen | DRB Member (HPC Subcommittee) | | Lexie Costic | DRB Member (HPC Subcommittee) | | Michael Stevens | Project Architect, Dykeman Architects | | Emmy Scherrer | City Planner | | Fiona Starr | Administrative Staff | ### Background Context This project represents the redevelopment of a prominent corner in Fairhaven's commercial core, replacing the former Zane Burger restaurant with a modern bank branch that must balance contemporary commercial needs with historic preservation goals. The Fairhaven area is Bellingham's historic downtown, featuring late 1800s buildings with Richardsonian Romanesque architecture. The site's location directly adjacent to the historic Sycamore Building and across from the Waldron Building makes design compatibility particularly important. The project required a departure because geotechnical analysis determined the new building must be set back at least 8 feet from the adjacent Sycamore Building's foundation to prevent structural damage. Rather than build exactly to this minimum, the applicant proposed a 25-foot setback that creates an outdoor seating area, requiring formal approval since it breaks the traditional continuous building wall requirement. ### What Happened — The Short Version Michael Stevens, the project architect, presented the final design responses to early guidance feedback from June 2024. He detailed solutions for lighting, solar shades, window awnings, cornice detailing, and site improvements. The Board reviewed the complete design including previously unseen north and east elevations. After minimal discussion and no public comment, the Board unanimously approved the requested departure to allow the 25-foot building setback for outdoor seating. The only minor concern was a preference for dark-colored chain link fencing with privacy slats in a rear service area. ### What to Watch Next - Building permit submittal with detailed lighting plan as required by DRB condition - Final mechanical screening review during building permit process - Construction timeline and coordination with adjacent building foundation protection measures

Study Guide is available with Premium access

Upgrade to Premium

Flash Cards

**Q:** What project was reviewed at this DRB meeting? **A:** People's Bank Fairhaven Branch - a new 2-story, 4,780 sq ft commercial building at 1315 12th Street replacing the old Zane Burger location. **Q:** Who chaired the Design Review Board meeting? **A:** Ryan Van Straten served as DRB Chair. **Q:** What was the main departure request from city code? **A:** A 25-foot setback instead of continuous building wall to create outdoor seating area due to foundation constraints. **Q:** When was the earlier design guidance meeting held? **A:** June 18, 2024. **Q:** What architectural firm designed the project? **A:** Dykeman Architects with Michael Stevens as principal architect. **Q:** Why must the building be set back from the adjacent Sycamore Building? **A:** Geotechnical analysis showed minimum 8-foot setback needed to protect existing building foundations from damage. **Q:** What historic architectural style influences the design? **A:** Richardsonian Romanesque style, featuring heavy stone bases with brick masonry facades and arched fenestration. **Q:** What are pilasters in this building design? **A:** Rectangular columns that project from the facade to create depth, rhythm, and shadow lines across the building face. **Q:** What materials will primarily be used on the building exterior? **A:** Brick and stone as primary materials, with metal as secondary material including aluminum composite panels. **Q:** What was the Board's concern about chain link fencing? **A:** They preferred dark vinyl coloring with privacy slats rather than galvanized chain link in the northeast service area. **Q:** What special canopy feature is proposed at the main entrance? **A:** A glass-lid canopy at the southwest corner entrance to allow natural light while providing weather protection. **Q:** What was the vote result on the departure request? **A:** Unanimous approval by all Board members present. **Q:** What design elements address solar heat gain? **A:** Fixed airfoil-shaped solar shades on south and west-facing second-floor windows. **Q:** How tall will the building be? **A:** 36 feet (2 stories), well under the 56-foot maximum allowed. **Q:** What happens next in the approval process? **A:** Building permit submittal with detailed lighting plan and mechanical screening review. **Q:** How does the design relate to adjacent historic buildings? **A:** Uses similar proportions, materials, and massing while maintaining contemporary interpretation rather than direct imitation. **Q:** What type of windows are planned for street level? **A:** Large storefront windows providing 70% transparency to create visual connection with pedestrian realm. **Q:** Was there any public comment on the project? **A:** No public comments were received either in-person or online during the comment period. **Q:** What parking is provided for the development? **A:** 13 surface parking stalls behind and to the south of the building, meeting code requirements. **Q:** What weather protection features are included? **A:** Metal awnings along 12th Street and McKenzie Avenue providing minimum 4-foot depth coverage.

Flash Cards are available with Premium access

Upgrade to Premium

Share This Briefing